Not sure whether to buy a new franchise or an existing one? This guide explains the key finance and due diligence differences to help you compare both options.
One of the most common questions franchise buyers ask is whether they should buy a brand-new franchise or take over an existing one. Franchise Business notes that many people are drawn to an existing franchise because it can come with systems, products, branding and a customer following already in place, while a new franchise appeals to buyers who want to launch fresh rather than take over someone else’s operation.
From a finance and due-diligence point of view, an existing franchise can sometimes be easier to assess because there may be historical business records available. business.gov.au says that when buying an established business, buyers should independently collect and check the financial information and examine the past three to five years of financials, including tax returns, BAS, balance sheets, profit and loss records, cash flow statements and sales records.
A new franchise can still be a strong option, but it usually requires more reliance on projections, setup assumptions and the strength of the franchise system itself. business.gov.au notes that franchise buyers receive benefits such as branding, operating systems, marketing materials and support, but it also stresses that franchisees do not have the same level of control as independent business owners and should research the market, the franchisor’s financial position and the business they are buying before signing.
The best option is not always the one that looks simpler on the surface. It is the one that stacks up commercially once you review the documents, the cash flow, the costs and the practical risks involved.
If you are comparing a greenfield site with an existing franchise business, Viewpoint Finance Group can help you assess which option is likely to be more finance-ready and better structured for your situation.
